10 July 2009

Ako Mismo! Ang kikilos para sa bayan ko

Revised 12 July 2009 at 0824 Manila time

MANILA – Ako Mismo. If it’s about commitment, I believe I’ve come to the right place: akomismo.org. I Myself, Siak Mismo (Ilocano). I registered with my commitment, ‘Ako mismo will blog creatively’ at about 1600 hours Wednesday, 10 July 2009, with the number of commitments showing 237,279. After about 30 minutes, the total is 237,468. As I am about to finish working on this at 1920 hours, the total is 237,783, or about 30 registering every 10 minutes. (On 12 July at 0905 hours, it's 238,701.)

What about the scientists and scholars of the University of the Philippines, where I happen to graduate from? Will they commit, or will they stay rooted where they are, on their ivory towers, on top of their protestations of love of country?
In the website, on the Wall of Commitments, here are some that I think are representative enough for this little essay:
Ako mismo panatiliin ang kaugaliang Pilipino – I myself will work to preserve Filipino customs & traditions.
Ako mismo ang gagawa at tatapos – I myself will finish what I begin.
Ako mismo tutulong sa mga Pilipino – I myself will help the Filipinos.
Ako mismo magiging malinis ang kapaligiran – I myself will clean my surroundings.
Ako mismo kikilos laban sa kahirapan – I myself will fight poverty.
Ako mismo tutulong sa kapwa ko – I myself will help my fellowmen.
Ako mismo ang susuporta sa musikang Pilipino – I myself will support Filipino music.
Ako mismo ang kikilos – I myself will do it.
Ako mismo ang magra-rally – I myself will rally.
Ako mismo magtratrabaho – I myself will work.
Ako mismo magtataguyod sa pamilya ko – I myself will support my family.
Ako mismo magiging tapat sa pagboto – I myself will be true to my vote.
AKO MISMO
ANG KIKILOS
Para sa bayan ko.
I MYSELF
WILL DO IT
For my country.
Don’t just stand there – do something! Anything!
Simulan mo ang pagkilos tungo sa muling pagbangon ng Pilipinas. Maliit man o malaki, ikaw mismo ang magsasabi kung ano ang gagawin mo. (Start doing it for the rise of a new Philippines. Big or small, you yourself decide what to do.)
Ang pinakamalaking problema ng Pilipinas ay hindi kahirapan o katiwalian o kawalan ng kapayapaan kundi ang pagwawalang bahala ng mga mamamayan. (The biggest problem of the Philippines is not poverty, or corruption, or lack of peace and order, but the apathy of the citizens.)
What the hell!? Is Ako Mismo a brilliant, sinister plot of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo?!
Calling to arms by calling attention to apathy. Certainly, that’s a huge wake-upper. Ask Jun Lozada and the Sisters who keep him company, as well Randy David, and they will tell you that corruption is the biggest problem of the country. You know whom they mean. Ask the activists in Congress like Satur Ocampo and Teddy Casiño, and Manny Villar and even Mar Roxas and they will tell you the biggest problem is poverty. You know who they are. Ask those in Mindanao and they will tell you that the biggest problem in the country is the lack of peace and order. You know the extremists. Ako Mismo does not absolve the corrupt and the mendicants and the traitors, but that’s missing the point of Ako Mismo as a movement. A force for good.
Jaime Garchitorena writes to his gang (forwarded mail, 04 May 2009, gangbadoy.multiply.com), very much worried about privacy and being taken for a ride:
To all those that signed up with AKO MISMO! You are now part of SMART telecoms network for potential campaigns in 2010. ¶ The amount of information they have asked is so detailed that they can track you down to your zip code and contact you any time. In all my years of signing up for information, I have never had a site require so much information AS REQUIRED FIELDS. ¶ This makes for a perfect voter mapping database and campaign tool for anyone that wants to pay SMART for the information. Did you think SMART would pay MILLIONS in production and advertising and talent costs for nothing?
Jaime, if you doubt Ako Mismo's intentions, so do I yours. It is not true that Ako Mismo is the only one requiring so much data & information from someone registering. I agree that it is a Smart database that can be used to launch a campaign, any campaign, and that means Smart is really Smart. If you begrudge Smart spending millions and getting back millions more, you must ask the same question regarding your laptop, the hardware and software. Did you think that, for instance, for its Windows Vista and Office 2007 Suite, Microsoft paid millions of US$ in production and advertising and talent costs for nothing?
Ako Mismo is the genius of Smart, I must say. Or, more accurately, it’s the genius of DDB Cares, who created this project. DDB is Doyle Dane Bernbach, the world’s #3 in advertising. I want to give credit to whom credit is due. I worked as copywriter myself for Pacifica Publicity Bureau in 1974, and I remember DDB created the little ads that made the tiny car a big seller: ‘Think small.’ That was the Volkwagen. Understandably, DDB claims that its founder Bill Bernbach started ‘the creative revolution’ 60 years ago. Maybe, but DDB kept that creativity to itself. It was David Ogilvy (Ogilvy & Mather) who unselfishly made advertising a distributed creativity, to borrow from the idea of distributed computing, by writing the Bible of Creative Advertising, his Confessions Of An Advertising Man, where he laid down guidelines for creativity that copywriters follow to this day. Michael C Gray calls it ‘The Little Red Book of Advertising’ in reference to the helpful, incendiary Maoist Bible Quotations From Chairman Mao. Ako Mismo, I might say, is distributed committing.
Of all the bloggers writing on AKO MISMO, what caught most my attention was Martin Perez whose blog happens to have the title AKO MISMO (martinperez.asia). One of his posts is, ‘AKO MISMO: WEB ACTIVISM OR SUGAR HIGH?’ (ALLCAPS – I don’t like allcaps but that’s how he writes it.) He writes:
Is this something truly wonderful, or just an elaborate, high-budget phishing scam? ¶ This may be the cynic in me talking, but I’d like to think it’s also the concerned citizen speaking. For I agree with the likes of Bikoy who worry that this is nothing but a feel-good website masquerading as a social movement. … And this is the dangerous game being played by Ako Mismo. By promising a movement of change and what not, they play on the hopes and dreams of many. Now they will have to follow through on that. For making good on promises is what they should do. We should do. I should do. ¶ Ako mismo, pero paano sila? (I myself, but what about them?)
Martin Perez completely misses the whole archipelagic point of Ako Mismo. Apparently, he hasn’t browsed the website. Martin, it is not the citizen speaking – it is the citizen committing. He is not concerned if he is worried that others are not doing their part. He is not doing his part if he is not committed. He is not committed if he doesn’t begin. What he begins is useless if he doesn’t follow through. What he follows through is nothing if it is not for country. Got that?
You know, all you Martin Perezes out there, I cannot help it but this Filipino in Manila must now quote here my favorite President, and he is John F Kennedy in Boston, saying: ‘Ask not what your country can do for you; rather, ask what you can do for your country.’ If each of us commits to do what is right, that is our distributed committing. Committing to caring.
If you ask me, Ako Mismo is about:
Caring. Ako Mismo in 1 word.
Caring enough
Ako Mismo in 2 words
Caring enough doing
Ako Mismo in 3 words
Caring enough doing right. 
Ako Mismo in 4 words
Caring enough doing right, Philippines
Ako Mismo in 5 words

No, you don't just commit to caring; otherwise, you're only good for 1 word. Only those 5 words are good enough!

06 July 2009

Loving Julius Fortuna. He redefined himself, taught us moderation

MANILA - ASIDE FROM Neal Cruz, did anybody else notice that Julius Fortuna forgave his enemies? Pag-puti ng uwak, pag-itim ng tagak. A Filipino sarcasm I translate thus: Wait till crows turn white and herons turn black. That will be the day.
Image courtesy of
Impossible! Julius was from the Left. How could Julius Fortuna have forgiven his enemies when he was a UP product, if not graduate? If you are a product of the University of the Philippines, you must be outspoken, fearless, highly theoretical, stubborn, intelligent, unforgiving. In UP, you learn to confront the enemy, not forgive him. I’m from UP; having overstayed 2 semesters more, I should know more. Been there, done that. (I know someone who famously forgave his enemies, but he was from the Ateneo: Jose Rizal, National Hero of the Philippines.)
Ridiculous! After all, Julius Fortuna had been a member of the national council of the radical Kabataang Makabayan (Young Nationalists) and Secretary General of the Movement for a Democratic Philippines, which coordinated and organized ‘the massive demonstrations now collectively known as the First Quarter Storm of 1970,’ and had gone underground in August 1971 when he learned he was ‘in the order of battle of the military’ according to ANN (author not named, 24 June 2009, businessmirror.com.ph). ‘Can Ethiopians change their skin, or leopards their spots?’ (Jeremiah 13: 23 NRSV).
Aboveground, out in another battlefield, Julius Fortuna died on 23 June from a massive heart attack, dead on arrival at the Capitol Medical Center in Quezon City. He was 61 going on 62 (30 July), a native of Odiongan, Romblon. He left his wife Sabina, son Amilkar and daughter Jillian (philstar.com). Among other things, he had been writing a regular column ‘East and West’ at the Manila Times (manilatimes.net) and hosting the news forum Kapihan sa Sulo (Hotel) in Quezon City. He was also Vice President of Samahang Plaridel. By the time he died, Julius had long turned from Radicalism to Moderation and, from all indications, he had loved this new role. He had redefined himself. An Ethiopian can change his skin; a leopard can change his spots. ‘Be transformed by the renewing of your mind’ (Romans 12: 2 NRSV).
We too have to redefine ourselves. Thank you, Julius Fortuna, for showing us that we can redefine ourselves, that we can renew our mind.
He had other lessons for other people. Ducky Paredes thanks Julius ‘for having been a friend’ (duckyparedes.com):
I will miss Julius Fortuna. We had plans – about looking up old friends when we had the time and so on. What I learned from Julius was the importance of not letting go of old friends and acquaintances. Julius cared about just anyone that he met in this life. Now that he is gone, I can only add: Thank you, Julius Fortuna, for having been a friend.
Fernando Gagelonia writes of Julius Fortuna and ‘his calm demeanor, his depth of knowledge of Philippine and world affairs, his commitment to freedom’ (24 June 2009, midfield.wordpress.com).
Samahang Plaridel (Plaridel Society), where he was an officer, writes of him (26 June 2009, philippinereporter.com):
Regarded as a commentator of high repute, he wrote on a variety of raging nationalist, geo-political and diplomatic issues affecting the Philippines, the peace talks with the National Democratic Front (NDF), the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) and the internal squabbles in Malacañang, the Senate and the Lower House.
Known far and wide for his insights into the events of the day and the political possibilities in the future, Fortuna also became an officer of the National Press Club of the Philippines for several years and assisted other organizations of journalists in pursuing welfare issues.
Jonathan De La Cruz says ‘he was selfless to a fault’ and writes of him (28 June 2009, tribune.net.ph):
Julius Fortuna, beloved son of Odiongan, Romblon, a friend and mentor to thousands, a brother to a whole generation of Filipinos and a dear friend to a growing circle of katotos (close friends), is gone. Pareng Jules to his closest pals or Komisar to friends and foes alike, he is now resting in the bosom of the Lord. He will be truly missed.
Paul M Gutierrez writes (30 June 2009, journal.com.ph) that ‘he was never quick in judging people and was always there for valuable advice.’
Nicon Fameronag (30 June 2009, manilatimes.net) mourns ‘the loss of a Romblon icon in journalism whose voice has been heard and listened to around the country’ and reports that Awe Eranes of the Romblon Sun mourns the loss of ‘a mentor and godfather.’ He writes:
I was also thinking of Manong Jules’ good fortune to have lived in an era that recognized – was grateful for – his transition from a life of revolutionary activism to a life of battling society’s iniquities through a more powerful weapon – the Word.
Manong Jules lived a full life regardless of his early death. That fullness he achieved when he chose to become what he became: a revolutionary, a thinker and a journalist who engaged the world when many others in his era opt to be co-opted and, therefore, are in danger of losing their souls while still alive.
That’s all news to me. I forgive them all for their ardent views on Julius and Odiongan, whether they are from Romblon or not; I am glad I am not from Romblon and I have never visited that island, so I can write about Julius from a distance.
I never even heard (or don’t remember hearing) of Julius Fortuna until my good friend Jerry Quibilan began attaching to his emails columns of Julius, the first one sent to me 14 September 2008; it was Julius’ column dated 06 November 2007, ‘No ouster for GMA and JdV.’ He was right. In that same column, Julius said Jerry Quibilan had predicted that General Alexander Yano would become the next Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces of the Philippines. He too was right.
Still and all, the most poignant of all the tributes to Julius Fortuna was written by Neal Cruz, another journalist I also don’t know from Adam; this is what he said (29 June 2009, opinion.inquirer.net):
During those eight years (under Martial Law), he was tortured repeatedly by the military, but Julius gritted his teeth and bore the pain patiently and silently without ratting on his colleagues.¶ Years later, after he was released, he bore no grudge, no ill-will, no hatred, no anger and no desire for revenge against his torturers. On the contrary, when he became a journalist, he helped many military officers, colonels and generals who could have been among his jailers and torturers. Often, Julius would arrange interviews for journalists over lunch or dinner with news sources who were military officers. Such was the forgiving nature of Julius.
I was awestruck when I read that last line. Forgive your enemies? That’s not a difficult act to follow – it’s just not practical, not doable at all. It’s so much easier to just say, ‘Lord, I love my family, my friends. I love my neighbors. It’s those other people I hate. They have made my life miserable.’
And so, learning from Julius Fortuna, I challenge those in high (and low) places in any church or group to achieve the unachievable, to love the unlovable. Faith is not enough. The Bible is all theory until you put it into practice.
‘Bear with one another and, if anyone has a complaint against another, forgive each other; just as the Lord has forgiven you, so you also must forgive’ (Colossians 3: 13 NRSV). Even those who cling to the Bible as the only source of wisdom know that there is more where that came from; here is Matthew 5: 43-48 NRSV:
You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be children of your Father in heaven; for he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the righteous and on the unrighteous. For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you greet only your brothers and sisters, what more are you doing than others? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
I like to call Jesus Christ a sadist because, of all commandments he gave, it was this impossible one: Love your enemies! How many Catholic – and Protestant – preachers can do that, have done that? It’s so much easier to damn your enemies, to blame those whom you hate, to point your fingers at those who are corrupt (a few people) and never point at those who corrupt them (countless other people).
Oh, of course, I’ve heard this refrain many times: ‘I can forgive, but I cannot forget.’ I don’t think the Good Lord will forgive and forget you for behaving like that!
It’s impossible until we try. Thank you, Julius Fortuna, for showing us Christians how to be obedient to God’s Law of Love.
From the news, I learn that professors of the University of the Philippines support the Reproductive Health Bill being considered in Congress (Domini Torrevillas, 27 June 2009, cited in tucp.org.ph). Do they know and subscribe only to the theory of Thomas Malthus that the growth of population will always overtake the growing of food? I thought UP professors were more intelligent than that.
The Malthusian theory has long been debunked (see also my ‘The Yankee Dawdle,’ 04 February 2007, americanchronicle.com). Thank you, Julius Fortuna, for showing us UP graduates the need to stop running naked and to sit down, to listen, to know more, and to protest less.
Julius Fortuna was an intellectual model, in part because he read and absorbed. Nicon tells us (as cited):
With Manong Jules, you always get quality minutes of intellectual discovery. The book I saw last in his hands was Thomas Friedman’s bestseller, The World Is Flat. He spent money on books and foreign newspapers, in the same manner that he was generous to struggling friends in the media. ¶ As a thinker and journalist, Manong Jules can slice through a conversation and insert a gem of wisdom, usually his take or view on a topic enriched by reading and distilled by years of experience in observing events and human nature, and of course, by regular interaction with the powers-that-be. ¶ All the years, however, he retained his wit and firm anchor on his Asi (Romblon) roots.
‘The world is flat’ means globalization is here and it’s an irresistible beast – you might as well tame it to your advantage. You have to think outside the beast.
And when I read more about Jules from other sources, I learned more. Here’s part of a long and fervent tribute from Fel Maragay (27 June 2009, manilastandardtoday.com):
He became a columnist for the People’s Journal and the Manila Times, creating a reputation for himself for his sharp and in-depth analysis of every unfolding significant national event.
He wasn’t a run-of-the-mill journalist. His mind was sharp, his reading was wide, his grasp therefore had length, breadth and depth. Still from Fel Maragay (as cited):
Jules’ versatility as a media man was used to the full when he explored another field, that of hosting and moderating media fora like the Kapihan sa Manila (Hotel) and Ciudad Fernandina. But it was his brainchild, the Kapihan sa Sulo (Hotel) every Saturday morning where he excelled as a forum moderator. He had the natural ability to shoot straightforward and intelligent questions that make the guests and resource persons think deeply and come out with sensible, enlightening and newsworthy answers. … Truth to tell, Jules is one of the few media practitioners who have mastered the art of interviewing newsmakers. This explains why the Kapihan sa Sulo has become the premier coffee shop press forum in the country, and that is no exaggeration.
I can imagine that to be a good host and moderator at the same time, you have to know the subject at heart, so you can moderate the exchanges and ask provocative questions, because you may have to; and you have to know Robert’s Rules of Order, so you can mediate any dispute, because you always have to.
Jules will be remembered as a crafty journalist who showed the way in raising the standards of his chosen profession, a generous person with a soft heart for distressed colleagues and who never lost his humility and virtues while he rubbed elbows with the powerful and mighty and reaped the fruits of his labors.
I asked Fel Maragay by email for more on Julius on his being a model moderator, and in today’s (05 July) email he writes, and I shall quote it in full (in italics) because it is a comprehensive lesson in moderation courtesy of the Man from Romblon:
Journalist Julius Fortuna might not have been another Ric Puno Jr, the virtuoso television talk show host. But as a moderator of media fora, he was a class on his own. ¶ In the last few years before his untimely death on June 23, I witnessed how skilled he was in his role as Moderator of the Newsmakers Forum at the Sulo Hotel in Quezon City every Saturday. ¶ He always had the right questions to ask of the forum guests and resource persons. He was equipped with this talent because of his intellectual caliber, his organized mind and his firm grasp of unfolding events or burning issues.
It’s easy to see that as a moderator you have to be better-informed. Even then, when you ask the right question at the right time, you may or may not know the right answer. You just try to stir up more life into the discussion, or steer someone away from a dead end, or a dangerous one.
Whether the resource person was a Senator, a Cabinet member, a military general, a spokesman of a political party, a top executive of an ill-starred inter-island ship, a survivor of a disaster, a leader of exploited farmers or a promising sportsman, Julius knew how to make them talk spontaneously and squeeze the juiciest and accurate information from them.
I never had the privilege of attending any of the Kapihan sa Sulo sessions, but I can imagine it all in my mind. I have been conducting interviews myself for a book I’m writing. Actually, what I do is not a proper interview – I ask the first question that comes to mind, or take the cue from the first things I see or hear. And so my interview usually lasts 4 hours – imagine that! That’s not an interview, that’s a conversation. I want the fellow relaxed so he can talk spontaneously and so that I can ‘squeeze the juiciest and accurate information’ from him. I have to be an interested listener, an active asker of questions. I even get to the point where I get some excellent, unexpected answers to some questions I didn’t anticipate I would ask! You have to be alert all the time.
Although we never bothered to ask him about his secret for steering a fruitful discussion, we had the impression that he always saw to it that he had enough background information about his guest or guests for the day and about the topic at hand. But oftentimes, he need not exert so much effort in getting the information he needed because most of these things were already stored in his brain. That is the advantage of being a voracious reader, a walking encyclopedia and a journalist who had a nose for news that Julius was known to be.
I’m a voracious reader myself, and for all of those 34 years of writing, while listening to someone, I have developed a feel for something new or improved or different. When I’m interviewing, I listen more than I ask questions. If you listen, it puts the other fellow at ease. Everybody loves a listener.
I believe the best moderating is not unlike the best interviewing – it doesn’t show. The other fellow doesn’t feel being moderated; it doesn’t look like he’s being interviewed. If you don’t know the answer, you ask the question. Even if you think you know, you should still ask – you can be wrong, or he may have some other things in mind that no one has ever thought of, and it may turn out to be a gem.
When a resource person tackled the hot issue of the day, Julius had the uncanny ability to raise a series of questions to make us understand its implications and significance from a wider perspective or from the viewpoint of national interest.
If you cannot escape the confines of your group’s ideology, if you cannot think outside the box, you cannot be a superb moderator. Sometimes you have to think without thinking of a box at all.
He would throw difficult, provocative and intriguing questions without sounding offensive or inquisitorial. When a person gets nervous, he loses his concentration. But Julius knew how to put the resource person at ease and in command of his thoughts. He would make the guest feel that he was doing great in his response and explanation. But that was only when the guest was saying sensible things. He also made it a point not to interrupt the guest when it was the latter’s turn to speak. That is a common fault of many a talk show or forum moderator that turns off the guest.
This is the point where you really need to know much more than the other fellow. If you want to ask intelligent questions, there is no substitute for knowledge beforehand. I can imagine Julius Fortuna thinking holistically, that is, thinking of the parts while thinking that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. With what he already knew, I can imagine he would be thinking vertically (as Tony Buzan with his mind map would) and thinking horizontally (as Edward de Bono with his lateral thinking technique would). I can also imagine the constant temptation to show off what he knew. The best moderator has the widest open mind, and Julius Fortuna must have been the best. I wish I had met him.
The task of the host-moderator is to break the ice, build up interest in the subject and keep the discussion flowing smoothly. He should know when to pause and let the panel of moderators and the audience have their turn to raise questions. That is a basic rule that Julius knew by heart and faithfully observed. In the same manner, he never hesitated to rule out any kibitzer asking nonsensical questions even it meant causing him embarrassment. Otherwise precious time would just be wasted and the forum would be taken for a ride by pseudo or hao-shiao newsmen.
That is to say, whoever the Kapihan guests were, they had met their match in Julius Fortuna, Moderator to the Max. Thank you, Julius Fortuna, for teaching us mortals the Virtue of Moderation.
Finally, I’m intrigued with the note that his friends Ding Gagelonia and Richard Rivera had cajoled him into blogging. So he uploaded on 12 January 2009 to his blog ‘East West Online’ (eastwestonline.blogspot.com) a post of 119 words in all, the first 2 sentences being:
It is my pleasure to join the new force in the field of information known as the blogging community. I must confess that I am not that familiar with computers and blogs, hence, I am glad to be inducted into this group, courtesy of my friends Ding Gagelonia and Richard Rivera.
He never followed up that small note in his blog. Julius Fortuna had met his match.

30 June 2009

Bill Gates: Rich reach poor in South Asia

BILL GATES IS THINKING of the poor; now, the poor must be thinking themselves. Today, 30 June 2009 Manila time, represented by Ellen McCullough and Austin Walters, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, ICRISAT and partners launched a climate-change project in a meeting at the ICRISAT campus in Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India. This is another hint that Bill Gates practices what he preaches: Creative Capitalism, the rich reaching out to the poor.
The project, with the long title 'Tracking change in rural poverty in household and village economies in South Asia,' aims to measure the changes in the climate of poverty in Bangladesh and India: western Gujarat, Maharashtra, northern Karnataka, Rayalaseema region of Andhra Pradesh, Orissa, Chattisgarh, Jharkand, and Bihar.
An apt project, as ICRISAT is the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, dedicated to 'science with a human face.' The partners include the National Centre for Agri-Economics & Policy Research of India, SocioConsult, and the International Rice Research Institute.
The project is essentially the gathering of diverse data over time on the dynamics of poverty at the household and village levels, for scientists to be able to describe and prescribe. With the advent of Climate Change, it is necessary more than ever that Policy and Projects be based on the verifiable realities in the field: biological, technical, social, economic. Nobel Prize winner Niels Bohr said, 'Nothing exists until it is measured.' And no measure amounts to anything until it is applied.
At the launching, Director General & Captain of Team ICRISAT William Dar explained the choice of study site:
In many ways, South Asia is sitting on a tinderbox. By 2050, its population is likely to exceed 2.2 billion from the current level of 1.5 billion. About 70% of South Asians live in rural areas and account for about 75% of the poor. Most of the rural poor depend on agriculture for their livelihoods. The sector employs about 60% of the labor force, while it contributes only 22% of regional GDP.
As it is, the poor do so much and contribute only so much. Why? Poverty in the villages of South Asia must be understood in terms of globalization, feminization of Agriculture, resource crises, democratization, population, labor markets, including incidence of HIV/AIDS.
South Asia is only the beginning of the project. Dar said:
Let me highlight that the agricultural data from this project will be a launch pad for a more systematic organization, synthesis and use to track agricultural and rural development not only in South Asia but also in other semi-arid and humid tropics of Asia and lessons can be learned for similar (environments) in Africa.
Personally, I'm interested in being able to see, out of the data gathered, how one would be able to gauge how much investments are made and how much returns are received by the farming villages themselves, not only by the government and private sectors. The farmers have too much time in their hands; I know, I am a farmer's son. I say: Let the poor ponder too about the verifiable realities of life, what they can do,
'The task of ensuring that the voices of the poor are heard is left to us,' Dar said. 'Let us make them be heard!' In this direction, I say, the rich have much and they can do much more if they want. Given that, the poor themselves must be encouraged to do much more than always and ever expecting manna from heaven.

22 June 2009

Dar wants movement for more food at less cost

MORE FOODS AT LESS COSTS for more dryland farmers in Asia – this was the message of Director General William Dar of ICRISAT at the opening day of an Asian gathering of scientists in the City of Hyderabad yesterday, 21 June Manila time. Dar was Guest of Honor at the First Asian PGPR Congress for Sustainable Agriculture held at the main campus of ANGRAU in the capital of Andhra Pradesh, India.
Among those present at the Asian Congress were the Honorable Minister for Agriculture of Andhra Pradesh, Raghuveera Reddy; Vice Chancellor of ANGRAU P Raghava Reddy, Director of CRIDA B Venkateswarulu, MS Reddy from Auburn University, Laxmi Kantha Reddy, Director of Research-ANGRAU, and S Desai, Organizing Secretary for the conference.
The Congress will run up to 24 June. ICRISAT is the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, and ANGRAU is the Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University. ICRISAT runs several partnership programs with ANGRAU and CRIDA, the Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture of India.
Based on the applied science of ICRISAT, a short list of low-cost inputs now includes micro-doses of fertilizers, drip irrigation, community rainwater harvesting structures, and crops resistant to drought, pests and diseases. The list today includes PGPR, acronym for plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. PGPR organisms grow in or around roots of crops and produce fertilizers (commercial products have the generic name bio-fertilizers) or safeguard such crops from pests and diseases (bio-protectants).
'The key to a sustainable future lies in improving crop productivity through ecologically friendly farming systems that are more effective in harnessing nature, and that will go a long way in enhancing the livelihoods of the poor living in the semi-arid tropics,' Dar said. In other words, man must rely more on natural materials and methods and less on chemical agriculture. Increasing costs prevent poor farmers from being good at their farming. For instance, chemical pesticides amount to 50% of the total cost of producing such crops as cotton and pigeon pea and must be avoided.
Dar said that 'over-reliance on chemical pesticides has resulted in safety risks' to farmers, along with 'outbreaks of secondary pests normally held in check by natural enemies, environmental contamination, decrease in biodiversity of natural enemies, and insecticide resistance.' That explains why we have more pests and they are more destructive. Some pests are now resistant to insecticides. Chemical fertilizers and pesticides harm the soil and water systems.
To protect the crops and, therefore, poor farmer investments, 'Enhancing soil health is a key strategy in the drylands,' Dar said. That is to say, conditions around the roots must be enhanced so that crops will yield more, lose less to pests and diseases, as well as cost less to grow, including water.
Scientists at ICRISAT have so far isolated and identified a large number of not only bacteria but also fungi that have potentials for producing bio-fertilizers (such as phosphorus, nitrogen and iron) and bio-protectants (anti-bacteria, anti-fungus, anti-insect). They have also started work on herbal plant composts that can help manage insect pests and fungal diseases.
In his address, anticipating that 'during the course of this Congress, new insights and ideas will emerge between and among participants,' Dar called for a movement 'to ensure food for the poor in the drylands using low-cost inputs.'

17 June 2009

ICRISAT helps avoid degraded lands & deserts


As events mark the World Day to Combat Desertification on 17 June, cutting edge scientific innovations of the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) deliver impact towards conserving land and water, hence sustaining and increasing productivity.
The World Day to Combat Desertification focuses international attention to combat desertification and land degradation. The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) has chosen the theme 'Conserving land and water: Securing our common future' for the observation of World Day to Combat Desertification 2009.
Desertification is one of the world’s most serious contemporary challenges affecting more than one billion people. It reduces the ability of the land to support life, affecting animals, crops and rural people. The reduction in plant cover that accompanies desertification leads to accelerated soil erosion by wind and water. As vegetation cover and soil layer are reduced, soil fertility is lost, causing land degradation.
According to William Dar, Director General of ICRISAT, and the Chair of the Committee on Science and Technology of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), land degradation and desertification adversely affect small farmers of the semi-arid tropics. ICRISAT’s research products and scientific innovations help prevent land degradation and desertification, thereby providing livelihood and income security to these farmers.
'The health of our lands is the basis of our food chain and climate, and the livelihoods of our small farmers and poorest people,' Dar says. 'The positive impact on combating land degradation can come only with the development and application of good science.'
ICRISAT’s focus is on integrated genetic and natural resource management (IGNRM), which in essence aims at growing improved crops on soils conserved and water harvested, with people empowerment as its core.
ICRISAT’s integrated watershed management strategy in India, China, Thailand and Vietnam has brought together improved agronomy and natural resource management practices for the benefit of dryland farmers.
In the nutrient-starved soils of sub-Saharan Africa, ICRISAT is increasing agricultural productivity through fertilizer microdosing, which ensures that the right quantity of scarce fertilizer is made available to the crop at the right time of its growth.
Similarly, conservation agriculture has been achieved in eastern and southern Africa, and the Sahelian eco-farm in West and Central Africa. When land and water is conserved, and improved crop varieties are planted, farmers’ livelihoods are naturally protected and agricultural productivities are increased.
Worldwide, desertification is making about 12 million hectares useless for cultivation every year. Through cutting edge scientific innovations like those from ICRISAT, this global phenomenon could be mitigated, benefiting most especially the poor people of the drylands. 

16 June 2009

Celebrating World Day to Combat Desertification

An open letter to ICRISAT staff from the Chair of the Committee on Science and Technology, CoST of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, UNCCD who is also the Director General of the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, ICRISAT William Dar.
Dear All,
The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) celebrates 17th June worldwide as the World Day to Combat Desertification (WDCD). At ICRISAT, we as the global leaders in coming up with science to improve livelihoods through sustainable development in the semi-arid tropics have a major responsibility to conserve land and water resources for securing sustainable development. This year’s theme of the World Day to Combat Desertification is Conserving land and water = securing our common future. We all need to pledge ourselves to do everything possible for conserving valuable natural resources such as land and water, which are the important pillars for the sustainable development in the semi-arid tropics. At ICRISAT, we need to highlight and remind ourselves constantly to adopt the Integrated Genetic and Natural Resource Management, IGNRM approach for minimizing land degradation and combating desertification to achieve sustainable development for the good of humankind in the semi-arid tropics.
Rainwater conservation is an important pillar of sustainable management and in this regard the approach of community watersheds that we adopt to improve the livelihoods of the rural poor in the semi-arid tropics is very relevant and we need to capitalize further by working together in partnership mode with all the stakeholders globally. As active Team ICRISAT members, your valuable inputs in terms of undertaking research for development to conserve water and land for improving livelihoods are very important.
On this day we rededicate ourselves to the mission of ICRISAT to improve livelihoods of rural poor in the semi-arid tropics by combating desertification and securing our future through conservation of land and water resources. As you are aware, I am Chair of the Committee on Science and Technology of the UNCCD and thus I am also striving hard to help build global partnerships to ensure that UNCCD makes evidence-based decision making to combat desertification for sustainable development.
Do your best and dedicate yourselves more to help conserve water and land resources for improving the livelihoods of the poor.
All the best!
Willie Dar

15 June 2009

Rizal in June.

What color is blush?
Revised 15 June at 0917 Manila time
I BLUSH. I PROTEST! In Protestant country, on 01 June 2009, US President Barack Obama, BO proclaimed June 2009 as the Pride Month for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (ANN, author not named, 02 June, radaronline.com). Will the Americans take that lying down? As for the rest of the world, the US President has just polluted the aura of June as the marrying month. Killjoy! I'm not surprised. I have always thought of BO as spoilsport (he spoiled the spirited run of Sarah Palin), as stuffed shirt (he's full of stuff, like bailing out a few of the rich failures of American business using the money of millions of poor Americans! He will surprise US some more). Is he or is he not? Look all around the world: People get the President that they deserve, they do.
As a Roman Catholic, as a Filipino, I much value June because it is the Birth Month of the National Hero of the Philippines, 19 June 1861, and he certainly wasn't gay or anything like that. But for lack of law, June would be the Pride Month for the Gentleman, Heterosexual, Virile, Malayan Genius Dr Jose Protacio Mercado Rizal y De Quintos Alonzo Realonda, native of the town of Calamba in the province of Laguna in the Philippines, martyr to the cause of emancipation of his race, not to the cause of frivolity. (Oh, he renounced Catholicism, yes, but more frivolity. And in the end he retracted.)
Austin Craig calls him the 'Greatest Man of the Brown Race' (joserizal.info). As a man, when I visited 03 June 2009 Rizal's ancestral home, that is to say the facsimile, in the City of Calamba, I saw it painted gay, I mean green (see my essay 'House of Rizal. I saw it painted green, I saw red,' 04 June 2009, myjoserizal.blogspot.com). Light green, in fact. I'm embarrassed up to now. What's the color of blush? If Barack Obama blushes, I imagine he will turn purple.
June is much too important to be left to Barack Obama alone! The month of June was very meaningful to the Philippines' National Hero in more ways than one. Let me tell you some of them.
On 30 June 1882, a month after Jose Rizal departs unexpectedly for Madrid, Spain, one of his friends, Vicente Gella intimates in his letter he knows exactly why Rizal has left his country, in these words: 'seeking the welfare that we all desire.' That of course is a translation from the Spanish; it could easily have been 'seeking the good that we all desire.' My guess is that it is higher education that they all are in Europe for, because the Spaniards in the Philippines have been making it extremely difficult for Filipinos to study in the Philippines. What's the matter: The Whites are afraid the Browns will learn that they are better?
On 27 June 1984, 2 years after Rizal's French leave, Mariano Katigbak writes him about Leonor Rivera:
Your fiancée is languishing, the effect undoubtedly of what is worrying her. I believe that it is the first time that she loves. Devoted to the man of her heart, she sees that instead of the happy ending coming near, it is moving away at gigantic steps. What heart will not melt at such a prospect?
It is in this letter on the girlfriend's sadness I discover that Katigbak prophesies his friend's greatness:
At the risk of wounding your modesty, I permit myself to tell you that you are destined to soar, for which reason I pray God for your prosperity and the glory of the Philippines.
A prophecy that will come true. In seeking reforms to remedy the ills of Spanish misrule in the islands, he has found his destiny.
On 09 June 1886, Rizal writes his family from Germany worried and hungry because he has been receiving neither letter nor draft (money) from them:
It is my serious and ardent desire to go home, for it seems to me that I cause too much expense and I wish to help the family in whatever way I can. I'm tired of Europe and I'm afraid to ruin the family, for they say the business is very bad.
The Rizals are into the business of growing sugarcane. The buyers dictate the price of sugar, as they do even today. Sugar seems historically to be always a buyer's market.
On May or June 1887, Enrique Rogers, a friend writes Rizal about the incendiary Noli Me Tangere, which came off the press a few months before (in March): 'It it enough to tell you that it has awakened great enthusiasm among the few who have understood it.' I'm not surprised. The Noli is after all satire that is very well written.
But all is not well in the Filipino colony in Madrid. On 20 June 1887, Eduardo De Lete writes Rizal:
My encouragements are few, though not my good intentions. The best glory for me is that which I may win in working for our country. The inconstancy, incivility, and susceptibility of the fools cost me a good many displeasures; we are many censuring and giving lessons and few working.
Lete is complaining that many members of the colony of Filipinos in Madrid prefer to work with their mouths rather than with their heads and hands for the good of the country. They have the ability to criticize but not the ability to work. (Alas, as it turns out 4-5 years later, Marcelo Hilario y Del Pilar takes over La Solidaridad; Lete divides the colony and attacks Rizal, and Del Pilar publishes that attack. The lion is wounded; he withdraws.)
On 21 June 1887, friend Jose M Cecilio writes Rizal that 'your brother (Paciano) is repenting for having written you to come (back home):
For this reason, I beg you to remain there until a better occasion for you. Your whole family agrees with this opinion, which is that of all who esteem you. ... I repeat, don't come (back), because we shall lose everything good of your brilliant career. Send enough copies to diffuse your idea etc. We shall do everything possible to make your work known, but you must remain there. All who have read it (the Noli) are enthusiastic.
Of course he comes back; on 06 August 1887, he is back in his hometown Calamba. But because of the continuing threat to his life, he leaves for Europe again February 1888.
On 16 June 1888, from London, Rizal writes Mariano Ponce in Barcelona and urges him to write in the name of the country in these words:
Why, having the ability to use the pen, the only weapon left to us, you do not use it for our moral amelioration?
In that same letter, Rizal says, 'I believe that we should be united.' Ponce replies on 22 June:
You are right in saying that we should be solidly united to ward off all the evils in our beloved country. Let us work together, every one of us within his own sphere, towards the same end. Let us have faith.
About writing, Ponce says, 'Not all those who wish to write can write.' But later, he will write for the Propaganda Movement.
On 26 June 1888, Evaristo Aguirre writes Rizal about hurrying political change in the islands:
I was expecting your bitter complaints, your disenchantment, the precursor of terrible discouragement! But no, my friend: Don't ask for the impossible; do not expect expansion within the narrow regime, reckless courage, open fight, imposing clamor amidst the state of things, that special situation, the product of time and the institutions in which an entire people have been educated, without experimenting even. What do I say? Without even a glimpse of the excellence of a better government, of another more advantageous system to substitute for the existing one.
Look at the Philippines today and you see history repeating itself! Let the people first see a better model of government at work, Aguirre seems to be saying, before the people will take notice. (Do I see a parliamentary form of government?) Aguirre continues:
Time alone, and with time the patience and constant work of those called upon to carry out the regeneration of that people, beginning with ideas, enlightening their minds, showing them new horizons, awakening in their hearts and minds the true ideals, can demolish the secular work, change and improve gradually their way of living.
There are no shortcuts to social reformation.
On 27 June 1888, Rizal writes Mariano Ponce that copies of the Noli have not been allowed to enter the country legally. About Ponce's ability to write, Rizal says:
That you have had little success in journalism does not mean that you are not fit to write. Not all of us are born journalists, nor are literary men all journalists. As for me, the question of writing in more or less literary style is secondary; the principal thing is to think and feel rightly, work with a purpose, and the pen will take care of transmitting it.
Do it for a damn good cause - your country. If not demand a damn good writer, what?
The principal thing that should be demanded from a Filipino of our generation is not to be a literary man but to be a good man, a good citizen, who would help his country to progress with his head, his heart, and if need be, with his arms. With the head and the heart we ought to work always; with the arms when the time comes.
I prefer the pen.
Now the principal instrument of the heart and the head is the pen. Others prefer the brush, others the chisel; I prefer the pen. Now it does not seem to us that the instrument is the primordial object. Sometimes with a poor one great works can be produced; let the Philippine bolo speak. Sometimes in poor literature great truths can be said.
On 22 June 1889, Rizal writes Marcelo H Del Pilar from Paris to Madrid:
Be convinced that for every good example a Filipino gives, thousands and thousands in geometrical progression are won, for God or Destiny is on our side, because justice and reason are on our side, and because we are fighting not for selfish reasons but for the sacred love of our country and our compatriots.
If we are. On 04 June 1890, Rizal writes Ponce and asks him:
May you finally take that trip to Madrid. Awaken there the goodwill of the (fellows). Those of Paris have many complaints against our compatriots in Madrid who are devoting their time to gambling.
Rizal has more important things to do than gamble. On 08 June 1890, Marcelo Del Pilar writes Rizal:
I have received your letter of 28 May and your statement in it that you have purposely refrained from sending us any article and that you will stop helping La Solidaridad is worrying me.
On 11 June 1890, Rizal denies that he is leaving La Solidaridad. He is now writing the second volume of the Noli (the Fili actually) and is busy. He ends his letter mentioning about the frivolous young Filipinos in Europe:
May our compatriots there obey the voice of their heart and devote the precious time of their youth to something great, which is worthy of them. We do not have the good luck of other young men who can dispose of their time and their future. We have upon us a duty: To redeem our mother from her captivity; our mother is pawned; we must redeem her before we amuse ourselves.
2 years later, the die is cast. On 20 June 1892, he writes a letter 'To the Filipinos' (he asks that this be published after his death) in which he says among other things, he has decided to go back to the Philippines despite the grave danger he knows awaits him:
I know that at present the future of my country gravitates in some degree towards me, that at my death, many would rejoice, and consequently many are longing for my downfall. But what to do? I have duties of conscience above all else; I have moral obligations toward the families who suffer, toward my aged parents whose sighs pierce my heart; I know that I alone, even with my death, can make them happy by returning them to their native land to the tranquility of their home. My parents are all that I have, but my country has many sons still who can take it to advantage.
If you will notice, that letter is dated 20 June; I believe he makes that fatal decision on his birthday, 19 June 1892. He goes back to the Philippines, and he is going to be executed for the crime of rebellion he does not commit, in a little more than 4 years. The color of blush is pink; the color of extreme heroism is red.