Shakespeare In Love, US Supreme Court In Orgasm?

clip_image002
MANILA: They see marriage as parts of one assembled egg, not a whole wholesome one (image from pyschologytoday.com). Broken eggs are definitely not the result of orgasm. Rather, the 5-4 majority of the US Supreme Court justices have broken eggs splashed on their faces!

The US Supreme Court declared on Friday, 26 June 2015, that same-sex "marriage" is legal in all 50 states of the United States. Writing the narrow majority 5-4 opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy said, referring to homosexual pairs, "They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right" (Bill Chappell, 26 June 2015, npr.org). That's a prevarication. Dissenting, Chief Justice John Roberts said (26 June 2015, medium.com):

If you are among the many Americans  – of whatever sexual orientation  – who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate todays decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it.

And I celebrate marriage between a male and a female, man and woman, boy and girl. For our entertainment, let me quote you lover William Shakespeare's sonnet, "Let me not to the marriage of true minds" and let me show you how much we can learn from it (shakespeare-online.com):

Let me not to the marriage of true minds
Admit impediments. Love is not love
Which alters when it alteration finds,
Or bends with the remover to remove:
O no; it is an ever-fixed mark,
That looks on tempests, and is never shaken;
It is the star to every wandering bark,
Whose worth's unknown, although his height be taken.
Love's not Time's fool, though rosy lips and cheeks
Within his bending sickle's compass come;
Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,
But bears it out even to the edge of doom.
If this be error and upon me proved,
I never writ, nor no man ever loved.

And now, let's watch Shakespeare in love! Thinking of the US Supreme Court justices who are thinking out of the box of love, stop, look & listen to this British mastermind:

Let me not to the marriage of true minds

If indeed a man with another man can be married together, or a woman with another woman, it is a marriage of true minds that cannot claim sanity. How can there be sparks of love when there are no opposites that can attract, only similarities, samenesses, mismatches? Same-sex "marriage" is in violation of even the law of magnetism; in love as in magnetism, unlike poles attract, like poles repel each other.

Admit impediments. Love is not love

Admit the impediments, my God! Make love, not war. When a man "makes love" to another man, the science of anatomy says they can do nothing but swordplay, and both will get hurt, not high. Or they can choose to horse around pretending to be horses. But the male anus was meant for downloading, not uploading! The female was meant for receiving, not giving; in making love, not war, it is better for the woman to receive than to give!

When a woman "makes love" to another woman, the science of anatomy says they can do nothing but play cymbals. There is no consummation, only consumption. They might make music, but only they can appreciate or hear. In any case, that would be forbidden music.

Which alters when it alteration finds,

What does a man find when he "marries" another man and sees that the other man is not a man but an altered woman and cannot alter that fact? Love hurts! What does a woman find when she "marries" another woman and sees that the other woman is not a woman but an altered man and cannot alter that fact? Love hurts! Love is not love that alters when it alteration finds.

Or bends with the remover to remove:

Of course, when a man and a woman make proper love, never mind where and what time, they have to bend to remove things that hinder movements and moments of love. Such anticipation, such a joy!

What happens when a man bends to remove the other man's things and finds that he is looking at a mirror of himself? I suppose the best thing to do is to switch off the light. Such a jerk! What happens when a woman bends to remove the other woman's things and finds that she is looking at a mirror of herself? I suppose the best thing to do is switch off the mind. Such a dork!

O no; it is an ever-fixed mark,

Of course, it's an ever-fixed mark! As a husband of 38 years, I have always known that, unerringly. I'm a man and you're a woman, and you know what I mean and I know what you mean. When you say, "Kiss me," I know where my lips must go. Do you want a 5-minute kiss? So do I. When you say, "Now!" I know exactly where you're driving at, or I am. No deviations, no missing the mark, please. There is no substitute for making love. If you don't believe me, you haven't done it yourself.

That looks on tempests, and is never shaken;

In any marriage, there are always tempests – actually, it takes one to tempt the other to anger. What happens if the man who "marries" another man finds something revolting in his partner? He cannot say, "You motherfucker!" because, pardon the expression, each one is in fact a fatherfucker. What happens if the woman who "marries" another woman finds something disgusting in her partner? She cannot say, "You motherfucker!" because that will be calling the kettle black, and she knows she is another kettle.

It is the star to every wandering bark,

True marriage is the star that guides every wandering ship, or sheep. What happens if a man strays from the other man he has "married"? I don't know. What I can tell you is that he cannot lose his virginity – he already did. What happens if a woman strays from the other woman she has "married"? She has a big, big problem: She cannot be a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal that she wants to be!

Whose worth's unknown, although his height be taken.

What is his weight in gold the man who "marries" another man, or the woman who "marries" another woman? Gold means "generous and giving, compassionate and loving, benefactor or patron, sharing wisdom, knowledge and wealth" (empower-yourself-with-color-psychology.com). The man, or woman, cannot give of oneself because s/he is already and simply a duplicate!

Love's not Time's fool, though rosy lips and cheeks

You think that over time, the man will learn to love the other man as his "better half" and the woman will learn to love the other woman as her "better half"? That is against logic. None of them is half – I told you everyone is whole!

Within his bending sickle's compass come;

The sickle of death comes sooner or later. What happens to the man who "married" another man? He will be judged in Hell. What happens to the woman who "married" another woman? She will be judged in Heaven and sent to Hell anyway. You can't take God away from all this, even if the US Supreme Court did, even if Filipino supergirl Angel Locsin insists to keep God out of this. "For this reason, a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife" (Mark 10: 7 New Revised Standard Version). "For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh" (New American Standard Bible). How can a man become one flesh with another man, a woman with another woman? Even God will have to give up on them.

Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,

Of course, a man can love another man and a woman another woman, but it's an entirely different ballgame when it comes to having sexual intercourse. You can't make love with a colored pencil using another colored pencil; neither can you make love with two roses smashing each other! In true love, the hours are too brief, the weeks are too long.

But bears it out even to the edge of doom.

Of course, you can love anyone to the end of time, but a man who "marries" another man and a woman who "marries" another woman cannot say truly, "Till death do us part," because God did not make them one – only they did, and they are not Almighty.

If this be error and upon me proved,
I never writ, nor no man ever loved.

If you can prove that William Shakespeare was mistaken in this sonnet, then you can say William Shakespeare was not the best playwright the world has ever seen, and no one has ever loved at all. And I never enjoyed writing this!

Popular posts from this blog

GABRIELA is scandalized by Asingan Bikini Open

"O Naraniag A Bulan." How an old folk song can help choose new Senators!

What Federalism? Precisely, That Is The Question!